| 
		 
		Thirty-Two Written Questions and 
		Supporting 
		Documented Evidence (as at 10 Feb '19) 
		
		
		Directed to a Financial Services Regulator or a Royal Commissioner  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		CLICK ON BELOW 
		QUESTION 
		NUMBERS  | 
		
		 
		
		Question 
		Recipient  | 
		
		 
		Issue/Problem/Negligence/Predatory/Discrimination/Deceit/Unconscionable
		'et al'  | 
		
		 
		
		 Click 
		on Number of Supporting  Evidence 
		Documents  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		 1st  | 
		
		 
		Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
		 
		
		Will the Royal Commission request financial data from the primary six 
		
		Credit Card Issuers 
		
		(Four Pillars, 
		
		Citibank and 
		
		Latitude Financial 
		nee G.E. Capital)  
		
		that identifies the contributors of 
		
		
		
		
		Interest And Penalty Fees Revenue 
		to test the 
		
		
		
		
		Writer's 
		calculation that 
		
		
		
		
		Persistent Revolvers account for 
		
		
		
		
		12.58%
		circa of 7,515,000 Credit Cardholders 
		- June 2016), yet contribute 80% circa of all
		
		
		
		
		
		Interest And Penalty Fees Revenue?  | 
		
		
		 
		
		12  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		2nd  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 Why 
			did the  
		Reserve Bank published 
		
		LOAN RATE STICKINESS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE in June 1992 
			and never act upon its 'sticky' findings re the plummeting 
		
		Overnight Cash Rate, in particular of the need to 
determine a new
Standard to re-regulate 
a maximum interest rate for -  
		*     each Credit Card
Purchase; and          
  
*     
each Credit Card 
Cash Advance, 
as the 
	
Writer recommended in
	
	Section 8
	of his 
	Submission to the RBA dated 25 Oct 2011?  | 
		
		 
		12  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		3rd  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		What 
did the 
		Reserve Bank hope to achieve from publishing  
		
		Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Aust:  "A Consultation Document" 
		in March 2001? 
		
		Why hasn't 
		the   
		
		RBA over the subsequent 17 years informed the Commonwealth government, as 
obligated under 
		
		
		Reserve Bank Act 1959 - Section 11, 'Differences 
of opinion with Government on questions of policy' of the
		need to 
determine in the 
		
		Public Interest new 
		
		Standards
		to apply the 
		User Pays Principle 
to the
		Retail Supply Side
		of 
		
		
		Credit Card Products? 
		 | 
		
		 
		3  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		4th  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Will the 
		
		Reserve Bank set a new  
 
		
		Standard, pursuant to 
		
	
	
	Division 4 Section 18, 
		to replace 
the debt 'lure' of an
		Interest Free Period
		with
		
		a
		- 
		
		
		*     
		Concessional Interest Rate Period;
		and
		 
		
		
		*     
		Purchase Usage Fee, 
		
		for each 
		
		Purchase
		with a 
		Credit Card, 
		so that each user pays 
for the benefits of their 
		
		
		
		Revolving Line/s of Credit?  
		
		Because the 
		
		Merchant is funded within 24 hours by the 
		
		
		Credit Card Issuer, but the
		
		
		
		Cardholder does not pay for 
		each 
		
		Purchase
		
		or
		
		Cash Advance 
		for up to 55 days later? 
		 | 
		
		
		 
		2  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		5th  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Does the Governor of the 
		
		Reserve Bank agree with the former Assistant Commissioner, Dr. Malcolm Edey's, 
below response to a question from the Acting Chair of the
		
		
		Senate Economics Legislation Committee
		on 1 June 2015? 
		
		
		        
		
		"... we do not have an interest rate regulator in 
		Australia............... 
		
		
		
		What we do have is 
an ACCC that can investigate uncompetitive conduct if they see it, but they 
clearly have not seen it in this market." 
		 | 
		
		 
		3  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		6th  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Does the Governor of the
		
		Reserve Bank
concur with the 
		1st paragraph on page 3 of
Senate 'Economics Reference Committee' summary report titled 
		
		Interest 
rates and informed choice in the Australian credit card market dated 
Dec. 2015 which justified Dr. Edey's 
response (listed in 
		Question 
			5) which asserted that the ACCC is responsible to monitor and 
regulate credit card interest rates, even after the  
		
		RBA had 
		
		Designated, 
		established an 
		
		Access Regime and 
		
		Determined a Standard/s?  | 
		
		 
		3  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		7th  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Does the Governor of the
		
		Reserve Bank
		agree with Dr. Malcolm Edey's 
below responses to the 
		Senate 'Economics Reference Committee'
		
		on 1 June 2015  because it is contrary to the findings in 
		
		LOAN RATE STICKINESS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE in June 1992 
		and empirical evidence in the USA, the UK and Australia over the 
		subsequent 26 years?
		 
		
			
			
			
			
			   "Yes, the 
								financial system works through competition. The 
								basic wholesale interest rate is the cash rate, 
								which we set, and then competitive forces will 
								cause other interest rates to move up and down 
								with the cash rate. That is the way the effect 
								of policy is transmitted to the wider economy." 
		  | 
		
		 
		5  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		8th  | 
		
		 Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 Is 
			the Governor 
		of the 
		Reserve Bank
			in 
			possession of empirical evidence that supports Dr. Malcolm Edey's 
			contention (in Dr. Edey's responses to the Acting Chair of the 
		Senate 'Economics Reference Committee' 
		
		on 1 June 2017) 
			that a viable opportunity exists for 
		
		
		
		Credit Cardholders that have 
			managed to 'chalk up' considerable debit, often across several 
			Credit Cards, to 
		consolidate those debts in a zero or introductory low interest rate 
			Credit Card to 
		
		
		".... pay off their loans more 
			quickly"? 
		Because 
		
		
		Credit Card Issuers 
		that offer 
		
Balance Transfer Interest-Free Period Offers 
		are not Benevolent Bankers, they seek to poach profitable
		Credit Cardholders from other 
		
		
		Issuers  
		evident in
		 
		
Balance Transfer Offers.
		  | 
		
		 
		4  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		9th  | 
		
		 
		
		 
Chair
		of 
		APRA 
  | 
		
		 
		 APRA 
Chairman 
		responded to 
		a Senator Hearing in Canberra on 3 June 2017
		
		"....the margins on credit card business look very high , certainly 
			to any other form of credit, and certainly I can't sit here today 
			with an explanation of why that is,"............ and ............ 
			"Informing us all about that is probably a useful piece of work". 
		
		 
		What did APRA 
		
		seek post 3 
		June 2017 to understand why Credit Card interest rates were so high, when 
		the 
		Cash Rate is 
		at an all time low of 1.5%?  | 
		
		 
		9  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		
		10th | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Has the 
		Governor of the 
		Reserve Bank who is the
		
		Chair of the 
		
		
		Council 
of Financial Regulators,
		and co-wrote
		
		
		LOAN RATE STICKINESS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE in June 1992, 
		ever discussed with the other two members of that Council, namely   
 APRA  
and  
		ASIC, the   
  
		
		RBA informing the Government, pursuant to  
		
		
		section 11(1) of the Reserve Bank Act 1959, 
of the need for the   
  
		
		RBA, pursuant to  
		
		
		
		section 50 of the Banking Act 1959, to re-regulate a maximum interest rate for 
		Purchases and 
for 
Cash Advances due to the burgeoning gap between the 
		
		Overnight Cash Rate of 1.5% and interest rates charged on low interest and on high 
interest Credit Cards that peak at 29.49% for a 
		Cash Advance using a 
		
		Latitude Financial
		
		
		
		"Go MasterCard"? 
		 | 
		
		 
		9  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		11th  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
		Will 
the Royal Commission recommend to the Chair of the
		
		
		
		Three Financial Regulators
		to provide Minutes of their quarterly meetings? 
		 | 
		
		 
		2  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		12th  | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Is the Board of the 
		Reserve Bank 
which is chartered under 
		 
		Section 10(2) 'Functions of Reserve Bank 
													Board' of the 
Reserve Bank Act 1959 
		to 
		
		
		
		"best 
													contribute to.......... the 
									economic prosperity and welfare of the 
									people of Australia"
		
		
		
		aware of the primary findings of the reports (published 
		from 2005) from the
		Productivity Commission, the ABS and ASIC that 
		classify and quantify the Financial Literacy Capacity of Australians that are 
ranked as low as less than Level 1 up to Level 5?
		 
		In particular that
		
		
		"For nearly half of the 
population were assessed at either levels 1 (the lowest level) or 2, both of 
which are below the minimum level deemed necessary to participate in a 
knowledge-based economy (level 3)."  | 
		
		 
		3  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		12(a)th  | 
		
		 
		Chair of APRA  | 
		
		 
		Is the Chair of APRA, 
		Wayne Byres, 
		
		
		aware of the primary findings of the reports (published 
		from 2005) from the
		Productivity Commission, the ABS and ASIC that 
		classify and quantify the Financial Literacy Capacity of Australians that are 
ranked as low as less than Level 1 up to Level 5?
		 
		In particular that
		
		
		"For nearly half of the 
population were assessed at either levels 1 (the lowest level) or 2, both of 
which are below the minimum level deemed necessary to participate in a 
knowledge-based economy (level 3)."  | 
		
		 
		5  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		
		
		13th | 
		
		 
Chair of ASIC  | 
		
 
Will the Royal 
Commission ask the Chair of ASIC that is bound by 
	
	Part 1-Preliminary Division 1 Objects
 of
the 
ASIC Act 2001 to -
*       "improve 
the performance of the financial system and entities in it; 
and 
*      
" receive, 
process and store, efficiently and quickly, information that is given to us",
to inform what action ASIC took to 
protect 
Financially Uneducated And Vulnerable  
Credit Cardholders
that have poor 
Financial Literacy Capacity, 
after it published 
ASIC Report 224 "Access 
to financial advice in Australia" 
in Dec 2010? 
		 | 
		
		 
		5  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		14th  | 
		
		 Chair of  
		
		Council 
of Financial Regulators  | 
		
		 
		Will the Chair of the 
		
		
		
		
		Council 
of Financial Regulators 
		provide to the 
		Royal Commission a schedule of the respective responsibilities of the 
		
		RBA, APRA and
		ASIC (and the clauses relied upon in their respective 
Acts listed at the top of this letter), that satisfy the 'Terms of Reference' and 
		'Statement of Expectations' 
		required under the 
		
		PGPA Act, that obligates each regulator to ensure 
competition amongst 
		Credit Card Products which involves seeking information 
to establish that 
		
		Credit Card Issuers
		are not 
engaging in
		
		
		
		Numeracy And Literacy Discrimination
		through
		
		
		Unconscionable Credit Card Advertising
		targeted at 
		 
		
		
		
		Credit Cardholders with low 
		 
		
		
		Numeracy and Literacy Skills?  | 
		
		 
		5  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		15th  | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
		Will the Governor of the 
		
		Reserve Bank inform why its 
		 
		
		
		
		Payments System 
Board's 'Responsibilities and Powers
		webpage
		does not also list the 
		
		
		
		Banking Act 1959
		under legislation that 
governs the Payment Systems Board's 
responsibilities and 
		powers?
		  | 
		
		 
		1  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		16th  | 
		
		 Chair of  
		
		Council 
of Financial Regulators  | 
		
		 
		Will the 
		Chair of the 
		
		
		Council 
of Financial Regulators
		
		inform
		if it sought 
		financial data from the primary six 
		 Credit Card Issuers 
		
		(Four 
		Pillars, 
		Citibank and 
		
		Latitude Financial 
		nee G.E. Capital) that identifies the number, 
		 
		
		
		Outstanding Indebtedness
		and demography of
		
		
		
		
		Credit Cardholders that are
		
		
		
		
		Persistent Revolvers
		after the 
		  
		
		RBA quantified in 
		Graph 7 of
		
		
		RBA Submission 
to the Senate Inquiry into Matters Relating to Credit Card Interest Rates - 
		Aug 2015
		the indebtedness borne by 
		
		
		
		
		Persistent Revolvers?  | 
		
		 
		3  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		17th  | 
		
		 CEO of the ABA that issued the 
		regulatory binding 
		
		
		Banking Code of Practice from 1 July 2019   | 
		
		 Will the Royal Commission 
		ask the CEO of the ABA - 
		
		*       
		
		if  
		
		Example 1 - 
Unconscionable Conduct - St George Visa Card of the
		
		
		
		
		Nine Examples
within
		Labyrinth of 
		
		
		‘Concealed Spiders’
		constitutes 
		
		
		
		Unconscionable Conduct
		
		(based in the ACCC's definition of 
		Unconscionable Conduct).  
		AND 
		*      did St. 
		George Bank by charging interest @ 20% from the date of each 
		 
		
Purchase  
		for the subsequent two months constitute an illegal 
		penalty under the common law equitable penalty doctrine, because that 
		interest charge was collateral to the main obligation 
					(to pay the 
 
Closing Balance 
		by the  
 
Payment Due Date) 
		and the withdrawal of the  
		Interest Free Period 
		was intended to 
					be in terrorem of the other party (the Cardholder).  
		It was intended to scare the 
		
		
		
		Cardholder 
		(Mr. McK_nn) into paying his 
 
Closing Balance 
		on time and the 20% interest rate was 
		a 
		Usurious Interest Rate 
		and therefore an unconscionable 
		penalty because 20% from the date of each 
		 
		
Purchase  
		did 
					not reflect the losses St. George Bank incurred as a result of the 
					 
		
		
		
		Cardholder's 
		failure to pay the shortfall of $40 (2.06%) by the  
 
Payment Due Date, 
		particularly as he was charged 20% on all his 
		 
		
Purchases  
		 
		of 
		 
		$1,936.92, 
		even though he had repaid 
		 
		97.94% of his 
 
Closing Balance  
10 days prior to the 
 
Payment Due Date. 
		
		========================== 
		 
		(Example 1 
		
		notes that
		  
		St George 
		
		
		
		Credit Cardholder, 
		Peter 
 
		
		McK_nn, 
		 
		had a 
 
Closing Balance 
		of $1,936.92 
		of his Visa Gold Credit Card and  
		 
		paid $1,896.92 (97.94%, of his  
 
 
		Closing Balance)
 
		to 
 
		
		St. George Bank  
		 
		on 22 May '14 (10 days prior to his monthly 
		 
 
Payment Due Date) 
		 
		which was a shortfall of $40 on the 
 
Closing Balance 
		of $1,936.92 
		of his Visa Gold Card.  Peter was charged interest @ 20% by 
		St. George Bank on  
		 
		$1,936.92 
		(his total   
		
Purchases  
		 
		
		for the previous month) even though he 
		had repaid   
		97.94% of his 
 
Closing Balance  
10 days prior to the 
 
Payment Due Date.  
		He 
		then forfeited his   
		Interest Free Period 
		for two subsequent months, whereby being charged @ 20% interest from the date of 
		each  
		
Purchase.)  | 
		
		 
		2  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		17(a)th  | 
		
		 Chairman  
		of ACCC  | 
		
		 Will the Royal Commission
		ask the 
Chairman of the ACCC, Mr. Rod Sims,  
to  
examine the information regarding advertisements for Credit Cards
		(explained in the 
		Nine Examples
within
		Labyrinth of 
		
		
		‘Concealed Spiders’),
		
		with 
particular regard to obligations under the 
		
		
		
		National Consumer Credit 
			Protection Amendment (Home Loans and Credit Cards) Act 2011, 
to determine if any represent 
		
		
		Predatory Advertising,
		ipso facto
		
		
		Unconscionable Conduct
		
		(based in the ACCC's description of 
		Unconscionable Conduct)?  | 
		
		 
		2  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		18th  | 
		
		 Chairman  
		of ACCC  | 
		
 
Will the Royal Commission ask the
Chairman of the ACCC, Mr. Rod Sims, if the 'Conditions 
of use' booklets issued by St. George Bank, ANZ and
Westpac (summarised 
in table in 
Chapter 1) 
and listed in  
		
		18th 
with text  
in small fonts 
on innumerable page constitute 
Unconscionable Conduct?  | 
		
		 
		3  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		19th  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
 
Will the Royal Commission recommend to the
Three Financial Services Regulators that they use their existing 
regulatory powers to require all 
Credit Card Issuers to simplify their 
Credit Card Products
so that their Credit Cards  'Conditions of Use' booklet, 
together with any Schedule/s referred to therein, - 
		
(a)       do 
not exceed 
50 pages in text no smaller than Arial 10 font; 
and 
		
(b)       the existing height and width 
of the booklet is retained?  
		 | 
		
		 
		4  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		20th  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
		 Does each of the 
		
		Four Pillars reducing their low interest credit card by 
5% circa amidst the prospect of a Royal \ Commission, 
evidence that the 
		Four Pillars  
that issue 80% of Credit Cards used in 
Australia, were uncompetitive during the
		
Council 
of Financial Regulators 'watch', when each of the   
		
		RBA, 
		ASIC
		and 
		 APRA
		have regulatory obligations to the Australian public 
to ensure real competition amongst 
		Credit Card Issuers, 
		
		in particular the RBA
		under
	
	Section 10(2) 'Functions 
	of Reserve Bank Board' of Reserve Bank Act 1959 to 
	
	
	
	
	
	"best 
													contribute to.......... the 
									economic prosperity and welfare of the 
									people of Australia" 
		and for the 
		
		
		Payments Systems Board 
		to always
Act 
in the Public Interest?  | 
		
		 
		5  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		21st  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
 
Will the Royal Commission recommend to the
Three Financial Regulators that they use their existing 
regulatory powers to ban 
Reward Programs? 
		 | 
		
		 
		6  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		22nd  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner   | 
		Will the Royal Commission recommend to the
		
Three Financial Regulators that they use their existing 
		regulatory powers to ban 
		Credit Card Issuers
		paying third party credit 
		card websites (finder.com, 
		
		
		
		
		canstar.com.au,
		
		
		iselect.com.au 
	
		'et al')
		to market/advertise/promote/recommend in any way, shape or form their
Credit Card Products 
because such advertisements are conflicted, often misleading and deceptive and targeted at 
		
		Credit Cardholders with low 
Financial Literacy Capacity as classified/quantified by the Productivity Commission and the ABS in 
Chapter 1? | 
		
		 
		2  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		23rd  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
 
Will the Royal Commission recommend to the
Three Financial Regulators that they use their existing 
regulatory powers to ban any 
		Credit Card Issuer
offering 
Balance Transfer Interest Free or Very Low interest introductory offers  
which 'poach' profitable  
Financially Uneducated And Vulnerable 
other bank 
Credit Cardholders
 
because 
Persistent Revolvers
 
that 
 
Lack Financial Acumen 
contribute 80% 
		
circa
	of all
	 
Interest and Penalty Fees Revenue generated from 
Credit Card Products?  | 
		
		 
		6  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		
		
		24th | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
 
Will the Royal Commission ask the 
ASIC 
chairman, James Shipton, why 
ASIC made 
the following statement in 
ASIC's Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into competition in the 
Australian financial system +- Sept 2017? 
           
"A senate inquiry submission by Treasury noted 
that in 2013 only 30% of surveyed users reported paying interest on their credit 
card balance.98 . 
Contrary to this self-reporting though, the share of balances attracting 
interest at the time was in fact closer to two-thirds.99"
						  | 
		
		 
		1  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		25th  | 
		
		 Royal  Commissioner  | 
		
						 
Will 
the Royal Commission recommend to the Governor of the 
Reserve Bank that it provide to
the House of Representatives in the 
Commonwealth Parliament an annual written 
'Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy' which includes, inter alia - 
A.       an annual written 'Report on the 
Profitability of Credit Cards'; and  
B.       certifies that Visa and MasterCard separately 
complied with the two weighted-aver age 
Interchange Fee benchmarks, 
including 'companion cards',
 during the relevant year, 
namely 0.50% for Credit Cards and 
8 cents 
for Debit Cards?
						 | 
		
		 
		4  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		26th  | 
		
		 Chair of Reserve Bank Board of Directors  | 
		
 
Will the 
Royal Commission ask the Board of Directors of 
   
		
RBA 
to declare their aggregate - 
 *       
Annual Cardholder Fees paid; and   
 
*        
Interest Costs 
paid, 
by  
the eight members in 
the 12 months to 30 June 2018 for enjoying the convenience of the 
Lines of Credit provided by their personal Credit Cards? 
  
		 | 
		
		 
		1  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		27th  | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 Will the
		
Royal Commission ask the Governor of the Reserve Bank what investigations the Reserve Bank 
has undertaken with Credit Card Issuers, the three 
	
Credit Reporting Agencies, 
	
Financial Counsellors 
and
Credit Card Distress Authorities 
		to understand the number of 
		 
		
		
		
		Credit Cardholders that are
experiencing
	
Extreme Financial And Emotional Distress 
and the various financial quanta of that distress?  | 
		
		 
		8  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		
		
		28th | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 Will the
		
Royal Commission ask the Governor of the 
		
		Reserve Bank
		what the 
Reserve Bank has done, and when it did it, to ensure that 
		Credit Card Issuers 
	do not issue further 
		Credit 
Cards to applicants that are
experiencing
	
Extreme Financial And Emotional Distress 
		due to already having been issued 
several Credit Cards?
	
	  | 
		
		 
		2  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		
		
		29th | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
Will the Royal Commission ask the 
Reserve Bank to draw upon 
its existing 
Extensive Powers to establish a Standard for a 'Uniform Credit Evaluation Methodology' that all Credit Card Issuers must observe similar to 
NAB's Microenterprise Loans
because too many Australian adults have obtained Credit Cards 
with excessive interest rates which would be lower if the payment defaults were lower 
due to a robust designated 'Uniform Credit Evaluation Methodology' that all 
Credit Card Issuers 
observed?  | 
		
		 
		8  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		 
		
		30th  | 
		
		 
		Governor of the Reserve Bank  | 
		
		 
Will the 
Royal Commission recommend that the 
Reserve 
Bank 
set a new Standard, pursuant to 
	
	
	Division 4, Section 18, 
that requires all 
Credit Card Issuers to issue a 'Provisional' Charge Card to any applicant 
under the age of 21 that has not previously held a 
Credit 
Card?  Any such applicant, predominantly school leavers, would need to 
repay the entire 
Closing Balance by the 
Payment Due Date for a minimum of three months, prior to being issued with 
a 
Credit Card?  | 
		
		 
		2  | 
		  |