|
Thirty Two Questions and Supporting Evidence Submission Letter to Royal Commission April-2018 Defined Terms & Documents 14th Question Will the Royal Commission ask the Chair of the Council of Financial Regulators to provide a schedule (to the Royal Commission) of the respective responsibilities of the RBA, APRA and ASIC (and the clauses relied upon in their respective Acts listed at the top of this letter), that satisfy the Terms of Reference and Statement of Expectations required under the PGPA Act, that obligates each regulator to ensure competition amongst Credit Card Products which involves seeking information to establish that Credit Card Issuers are not engaging in Numeracy And Literacy Discrimination through Unconscionable Credit Card Advertising targeted at Credit Cardholders with low Numeracy and Literacy Skills?
Supporting Documented Evidence re 14th Question
1. Based on the below and above referred responses by Dr. Edey on 1 June 2017, the Council of Financial Regulators has breached its Statutory Duties with regard to understanding Extreme Financial And Emotional Distress experienced by many Persistent Revolvers that pay for the Lines of Credit enjoyed by Transactors at virtually no cost and often receiving tax-free Rewards Programs:
2. The RBA regulated the commercial bank between 1960 and the early 1980s 'with an iron fist in a velvet glove' relying upon section 50 of the Banking Act 1959. 3. Below is and extract from page 2 of ASIC's "Check Against Delivery" dated 6 March 2018 for the Productivity Commission Inquiry into competition in the Australian financial system: Hearings on draft report:
4. Below is and extract from page 28 of the Government response to the Financial System Inquiry - Improving Australia's Financial System - 20 Oct 2015:
5. Below is the only reference to Credit Cards in the RBA's Financial Stability Review - Oct 2015:
|
|
|