Thirty Two Questions and Supporting Evidence Submission
Letter to Royal Commission April-2018 Defined Terms & Documents
8th Question
Will the Royal Commission ask the Governor of the Reserve Bank if
the RBA is in possession of empirical evidence that supports Dr. Malcolm Edey's
contention (in the below verbal exchange with the Acting Chair of the Senate
'Economics Reference Committee' on 1 June 2017)
that a viable opportunity exists for Credit Cardholders that have managed to
'chalk up' considerable debit, often across several Credit Cards, to consolidate
those debts in a zero or introductory low interest rate Credit Card to "....
pay off their loans more quickly"?
Because
Credit Card Issuers
that offer
Balance Transfer Interest-Free Period Offers
are not Benevolent Bankers, they seek to poach profitable
Credit Cardholders from other
Issuers
evident in
Balance Transfer Offers.
"Dr Edey : We often get asked that question. I have heard that question put a lot
in relation to mortgage interest rates, because there was a period of time,
particularly during the GFC, where mortgage rates were not moving one for one
with the cash rate as well. The response that we have always given to that is
that the cash rate is a still a significant driver of those rates, so it is
still having an influence. We take into account movements in the margins between
those rates in determining what the appropriate level of the cash rate is. In
principle, the same is true for the credit card rates. Referring back to what I
said earlier, the amount of credit card debt and interest is much smaller than
is the case for mortgages and for business loans, so it is not—
ACTING CHAIR: I can understand why from the perspective of a bank, and the
Reserve Bank's perspective, it is smaller in terms of overall impact for the
economy. But it is fair to say that for the people who are caught in things like
debt traps and who are caught with credit card debt—and they may be small
numbers—it is quite significant isn't it?
Dr Edey : It is significant for the people who are paying it. But it is just not
particularly big for the economy as a whole. Another thing that has been
going on over the last couple of years is that there are interest-free cards, or
low-interest cards, that you can get by being prepared to switch if you are on a
standard credit card rate. Increasingly, people have been doing that, or they
have been paying off their loans more quickly so that they do not incur
interest.
ACTING CHAIR: Hang on. That is a furphy of an argument. The point is, and you
just agreed to this a minute ago: the gap is at a record high for low-rate cards
as well as high-rate cards. For all cards, it is at a record level, isn't it? It
is not as if I can go to a low-rate card and I will be okay. Even for the
low-rate cards, the gap between that and the cash rate has now reached a record
level.
Dr Edey : That gap has gone up as well. But there are also zero-rate cards.
The banks do offer switching packages where you can get an interest-free card if
you switch banks.
Mr Campbell : For a few months.
Dr Edey : For limited periods. What I am saying is that there are ways you can
take advantage of the competition that is there to reduce your interest.
ACTING CHAIR: I just want to be very clear, Dr Edey, on what you are saying. I
want to be able to walk away from this and get a good understanding. The point
you seem to have been making is this—and I want to put this together; tell me if
this is incorrect. Firstly, what you are saying, from the evidence that you seem
to be presenting, does question some of the assertions that have been made as to
why the gap is so high. The point you seem to be making is: 'Yes, we are
talking'—and you are going to get us the exact figures, but the default rates
are quite small; the non-performance rate is quite small. We want to get to the
bottom of how and why the gap between credit card rates and the cash rate has
reached a record level. We are asking you, Dr Edey, whether it is something the
Reserve Bank is prepared to look at, and it seems to be that the answer you are
giving us is, 'No.'
Dr Edey : No, I am not saying 'No' at all. All I am really saying is:
somebody should look at it, and I think that we should consult with our
colleagues in other agencies to determine who is the best placed to lead it."
=================================================
Supporting Documented Evidence re 8th Question
1. Three
months after Dr. Edey asserted
(below) that a debt solution was available, ASIC requested
five years data from 12 Credit Card Issuers, including the Four Pillars,
Citibank, HSBC and Macquarie, to assess whether banks are deliberately targeting
interest-free promotions at customers who are likely to end up taking longer to
pay off their Credit Card debts; and
2. Treasury,
Submission to Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry into matters
relating to credit card interest rates, 11 Aug 2015 notes (on
page 5) that "....
70 of the 95 credit cards the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) regularly monitors
currently offer discounted balance transfers listed in Appendix
B.
3. There is Welter Of Evidence that
some Credit Card Issuers, notably Citibank,
offer Zero Balance Credit Cards (to other bank Credit Cardholders) that
consolidate (other bank) Credit Cardholders cumulative debts to poach Credit
Cardholders because Zero
Balance Credit Cards are profitable because they target other bank Credit
Cardholders with poor Financial
Literacy Capacity?
4. Below are extracts from print
journalist, George Lekakis, succinct, scathing article for THE
NEW DAILY on Jun 2, 2015 "Watchdogs
quiet as banks gouge credit cards":
"Amid mounting evidence of bank gouging on credit cards, Australia’s
corporate watchdogs are failing to protect consumers.
Dr Edey’s comments during the hearing also highlighted fundamental
flaws in the way banks and other financial institutions are
regulated in this country.
The truly big revelation in Dr Edey’s comments to parliament was
that no regulator in the country has recently seen fit to
investigate the gaping margin between credit card costs and the
prices at which they are sold.
In response to questions from Labor senator Sam Dastyari and
independent senator Nick Xenophon, Dr Edey acknowledged that it was
an important issue that should be examined by a regulator, but he
wasn’t sure which one.
This raises another issue, namely the failure of the Council of
Financial Regulators – which the Reserve Bank coordinates – to
identify credit card pricing as an area worthy of inspection by
regulators.
The RBA and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority have the
power to access sensitive data on the banks’ credit card businesses
and even though a persuasive case already exists that price gouging
is occurring, no regulator has fired a salvo.
If the Council was doing its job properly the knowledge of the
banking regulators would have already been shared with the
competition watchdogs – the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
The fact that it hasn’t underlines a major flaw in the current
regulatory framework.
That probably has a lot to do with the RBA’s co-ordinating role in
the Council’s work and the central bank’s alarming indifference
towards competition as a policy concern.
If part of the RBA’s mandate is to protect the welfare of
Australians in its execution of monetary policy, the Governor’s
commentary on credit cards pricing is a fail." |
5.
|