|
1305, 12 Glen St -
The Pavilion on the Harbour' scribepj@bigpond.com 0434 715.861 Insert one of the enclosed DVDs in a Windows PC to auto-open this Letter_to_Andy_ Kollmorgen_10-Feb-19.htmIf using a MAC or the enclosed USB Stick Flash Drive, or the enclosed DVDs do not auto-open, open this letter at CreditCards/Choice/Letter_to_Andy_Kollmorgen_10-Feb-19.htm Click on the countless embedded threads therein - either in black underlined or blue 10 February 2019
Andy Kollmorgen 57 Carrington Road Marrickville NSW 2204 Dear Andy
1. Discussion Paper primarily addressing breaches of Statutory Duty by the RBA as Principal Regulator of the Payments System through its Payments Systems Board
2. Thirty Two Written Questions (and Supporting Documented Evidence) to facilitate the next Federal Govt. extending the Royal Commission to address inter alia Predatory Marketing of Credit Card Products to Financially Uneducated And Vulnerable Australians - many have suffered Extreme Financial And Emotional Distress The Writer wishes to publish his Discussion Paper and his Thirty Two Written Questions (and the Supporting Documented Evidence) on a website after his Discussion Paper and each of his Thirty Two Written Questions has been peer reviewed. He would then email Financial Services Reformists and other Interested Entities seeking them to review both documents in the hope that the next Federal Govt. would extend the Royal Commission to address Unconscionable Conduct and Unconscionable Credit Card Interest Rates/Usurious Interest Rates and Numeracy And Literacy Targeting 'et al' by some Credit Card Issuers and the failure of Australia's Principal Regulator of the Payments System to -A.) regulate the User Pays Principle which accords with The Public Interest Test that the RBA recommended from pg 115 in 5.2 'Scheme regulations and competition benchmarks' of its paper "Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Aust: "A Consultation Document" published Dec 2001: 198 The principles that consumers should face prices that take into account the relative costs of producing goods and services, as well as demand conditions, and that resources should be free to enter a market in response to above-normal profit opportunities, have been the guiding principles for tariff reform and market deregulation in Australia. Such market reforms may impact unevenly on different groups – some gaining, some losing – but they are now the well-established route to more efficient use of resources in the Australian economy." Alas, the above aspirations by the RBA back in 2001 for a "... movement towards a “user pays” approach to credit card payment services ..." never materialised, because of the horrendous interest/fees burden still born by Persistent Revolvers. B.) re-regulate *** a maximum interest rate for Credit Card Purchases and a maximum interest rate for Credit Card Cash Advances after Three Pivotal 'Landmark' RBA Published Papers in the last 26 years that recognised the increasing spread between the Overnight Cash Rate and Highest Credit Card Interest Rates because of the financial burden falling upon Persistent Revolvers that invariably possess low Financial Literacy Capacity and are perpetually paying Usurious Interest Rates. An Unconscionable 80% circa of all Interest And Penalty Fees Revenue levied by Credit Card Issuers annually is paid by Persistent Revolvers.*** Below is an extract from the bottom of page 7 of University of Wollongong 'Economics Working Paper Series 2012': (In April 1985 the Overnight Cash Rate was 17.2% circa.) Could you provide to the Writer contact details of one or two economic/legislative academics, or others, that are fervent that the Royal Commission ensures that Two Of Australia's Three Financial Services Regulators rely upon their existing regulatory powers to regulate that Credit Card Issuers desist inter alia Predatory Marketing by Numeracy And Literacy Targeting of Financially Uneducated And Vulnerable Australians ? Alternatively, ask anyone that is dissatisfied with the regulatory performance of the Principal Regulator of the Payments System to review 1. and 2. above.Should you provide contact details of one or two academic economists/legislators that peer reviewed the Writer's Discussion Paper and/or his Thirty Two Written Questions and responded with comments, the Writer would provide a written commitment to you to have first rights to write an article/s, on the Discussion Paper and/or his Thirty Two Written Questions that you, or your associate, wanted to. He would also provide a written undertaking to acknowledge the input of any economic/legislative academic/s who reviewed his Discussion Paper and/or Thirty Two Written Questions. Such acknowledgement of any peer reviewers would appear immediately under the final cut of his Discussion Paper and Thirty Two Written Questions on his website.NB: If the Writer does not hear from you, or your associate, within nine days from the date of this letter, he will similarly write to other journalists, one at a time. Yours sincerely Phil Johnston aka Bank Teller |
|
|