Defined Terms & Documents

Section 8 of the Writer's  letter to RBA dated 8 Dec 2011 lists the below eight recommended changes to Credit Card monitoring and pricing:

8.         Philip Johnston asks the RBA to -

            a)         accept that unlike the powerful lobby groups noted in Section 2 above, Credit Cardholders do not have access to a powerful lobby group to protect their interests; and

            b)         provide A) to H) below so that the credit card system is paid for by its users on a "user pays basis", and not by many who can least afford it, because they were not "lucky" enough to be born with, or taught, requisite money management skills or take on a hefty mortgage during a period when the property market continued to appreciate 

 

Attachment 'B' provides an impressive array of achievements by the RBA in administering the credit and debit card systems.  In doing so, the RBA provides precedent for this letter requesting the RBA to rely upon the Payment Systems (Regulation) Act 1998 which gives the RBA "extensive powers" to -

A)       "gather information from payment system participants and operators" by proceeding to obtain data for a particular month (or quarter) from over 70 issuers for the 330 different types of cards that are available which shows:

1.       Number of cards that repaid total indebtedness and aggregate dollar amount of those repayments.

2.       Number of cards that repaid > or =50% of total indebtedness and aggregate dollar amount of those > or = 50% repayments.

3.       Number of cards that repaid<50% but >5% of total indebtedness and aggregate dollar amount of those <50% but >5% repayments.

4.       Number of cards that repaid <=5% of total indebtedness and aggregate dollar amount of those <=5% repayments;

B)       "determine rules for participation in a payment system and set Standards for safety and efficiency, incl. issues such as performance benchmarks" by proceeding to implement "cost-based benchmarks" [akin to (I.), (II.) and (III.) in Section 2 [of this letter to the RBA] by -

            (a)        setting a regulatory cap for all the 330 different types of cards which fall under the jurisdiction of the RBA of -

                         i)        850 basis points above the RBA official interest rate (Overnight Cash Rate) as the maximum annual on-going interest rate charged by Credit Card Issuers in Australia for Purchases, where Credit Card Issuers can reach, but not exceed, this Purchase Interest Rate Cap;

                         ii)       950 basis points above the RBA official interest rate (Overnight Cash Rate) as the maximum annual on-going interest rate charged by Credit Card Issuers in Australia for Cash Advances, where Credit Card Issuers can reach, but not exceed, this Cash Advance Interest Rate Cap - refer 50% cap on cash advances in D) below; and

                         iii)      $90 for the maximum Annual Credit Card Fee that a Credit Card Issuer can charge (in 1993 restrictions on annual fees for credit cards were removed, so it is not unreasonable to introduce a cap, particularly as some cards charge inordinately high annual fees to provide 'inter alia' high loyalty points which surprisingly avoid income and FBT taxes.  Why should a Credit Cardholder be entitled to claim as a tax deduction an annual fee of $395 to then earn 3 points for every dollar spent and not pay income tax on that earning?)

                         

            (b)        learning from point 1. of CBA's research in Section 4, set an 'Access Regime' that each credit card issued in Australia to a person who has not previously owned a credit card be a Provisional Charge Card, hereinafter PCC, with a conservative credit limit where the owner of the PCC is required for the initial 12 months to repay the outstanding balance on the PCC in full by the due date (9 days from the Issue Date and 7 days from the normal receipt date for postal delivery) or be subject to severe late fees and restrictions on future PCC use, with deferment of receiving a traditional Credit Card until the PCC owner complies with the PCC repayment obligations for 12 months without breach.   

C)        reduce the non-interest period from 'up to 55 days' to 'up to 42 days' to reduce the cost burden on Credit Card Issuers because electronic payments enable Credit Cardholders to pay their monthly repayments within a few days of notification of the final monthly balance.   

D)        continue to sanction the market practice of not providing a non interest period for Cash Advances, but restrict the limit for Cash Advances to 50% of the total credit limit because as Wikipedia explains -
*        "
a credit card is a small plastic card issued to users as a system of payment"; and
*         the original cards "
required the entire bill to be paid with each statement".

E)        increase the minimum repayment required from 2.5% to 25% of the outstanding debit balance which shouldn't faze over >60% of Credit Cardholders and will materially reduce the interest burden on the remaining <40%.

F)        allow Credit Card Issuers to levy -

             a)        an explicit 'Lost Card Fee' for -

                         *          placing a stop on an account; and/or

                         *          issuing a replacement credit card(s) commensurate with the cost to the Credit Card Issuers of issuing a replacement credit card(s); and

             b)        a 'Fraud Provision Fee' upon each Credit Cardholder each month based on the quantum of transactions and the outstanding undrawn indebtedness (eg. for a Credit Cardholder with a $5,000 credit limit, who made 10 purchases in a month, with an outstanding undrawn balance of $3,000 (vulnerable to fraudulent access) the 'Fraud Provision Fee' for that month would be say 10 @ 0.15c = $1.50 + say $3,000 @ 0.0003c = $0.90 for a total monthly 'Fraud Provision Fee' of $2.40 for enjoying the convenience of using a credit card for 10 transactions with a $5,000 credit limit.  

G)        establish a uniform credit evaluation methodology that all Credit Card Issuers must observe similar to NAB's Microenterprise Loans because to many Australian adults are obtaining credit cards with excessive interest rates which would be lower if the defaults were lower due to a robust standard credit analysis methodology.

H)        prosecute the case on behalf of the "unlucky" Australians with Baycorp Advantage 'et al' and the Credit Card Issuers to establish and regulate protocols and systems so "unlucky" Australians cannot obtain between 6 and 10 credit cards, as evidenced by Tony Devlin, Head Financial Counsellor, Salvation Army's Moneycare service, in Section 4 above.  

Attachment 'C' and Attachment 'D' provides authority for the RBA Board and the PSB to -

 I.          pursue A) to H) above; and

 II.         inform the Government that the RBA's monetary and banking policy needs to regulate to implement B)(a) and B)(b) above "for the economic prosperity and welfare of (ALL) the people of Australia" and not merely the "lucky" ones.