Changing the
procedures governing state court appeals and petitions that challenge death
penalty convictions and sentences, including requiring the amount of time that
legal challenges to death sentences take to a maximum of five years.
California Proposition 66, the Death
Penalty Procedures Initiative, designates special courts to
hear challenges to death penalty convictions,
limits successive appeals and expands the pool of lawyers who could handle those
appeals – all in an effort to speed up executions.
Below is an
extract from the Discussion Paper:
g)
People that have spoken in favour of Capital Punishment
"The main reason for the abolition of the death penalty is the
squeamishness of politicians, who enjoy office but do not like all the
duties which power loads on to their (often rather narrow) shoulders. Far
easier to them to leave the matter to some trembling constable with a gun in
a dark street, who can be disavowed if it all goes wrong later."
"Rigorous
precautions can ensure incorrect execution is all but impossible, with the
death penalty available only in cases in which evidence is diverse and
overwhelming. The accused must be convicted by a unanimous jury of their
peers and their conviction open to repeated appeal.
"For the vast majority, capital punishment isn't motivated by lustful
revenge, but by a desire to protect the gentle and kind amongst us, punish
heinous criminals in just proportion to the severity of their crime, and
dramatically reaffirm objective moral truth."
"Whilst retribution is paramount,
the State is also responsible for the protection of its citizens, an
endeavour that is proving increasingly difficult. Nations that allow
dangerous murderers to live, create potential victims both inside and
outside of prison. Since the abolition of capital punishment in the West, numerous killers
have taken further life following their initial conviction for murder."