|
|
Defined Terms Baker's Dozen Problems Articles & Reports - Bibliography Petition 11. Principal reason to re-introduce both Corporal Punishment and Capital Punishment to demonstrably reduce Spouse Revenge Filicide, with flow-on reductions in the other Four Categories of Filicide and also reduce annual Femicide deaths The Commonwealth Government - A) holds a duty of care to influence fathers, step-fathers or jilted lovers contemplating Spouse Revenge Filicide to be an unappealing and unwanted course of action; and B) must again allow criminal court judges in its States and Territories to once again Sentence the most potent Deterrent of frightful, painful Corporal Punishment followed by fear-engendering Capital Punishment, to best protect vulnerable defenceless children, thereby demonstrably reduce, and in many years eliminate, Spouse Revenge Filicide. Such a Dual Punishment will achieve a flow-on reduction in the other four of the Five Categories of Filicide and also reduce annual Femicides.
To safeguard as much as humanly possible prospective future child victims of Spouse Revenge Filicide, it behooves the Federal Parliament to amend the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Torture Prohibition and Death Penalty Abolition) Act 2010 (Cth) to enable Australian judges in the six States and two Territories to revert to Sentencing - a) to each father, step-father and jilted male former partner (over 18 years of age) that has been found guilty Beyond any doubt of executing their child or step-child or children; b) where such filicide execution/s are adjudged in the category of Spouse Revenge Filicide; |
|
|
[bottom.htm] |