Below are excerpts from "Credit card minimum repayments the hidden danger in your post-Christmas bill" - SMH - 26 Dec 2016
Gerard Brody, chief executive of Consumer Action Law Centre, said that credit card users should focus on the total amount outstanding on their credit card statement and pay off as much as possible rather than the minimum payment.
"The minimum payment might look easy to pay, but that's all the bank wants you to pay," he said.
"They know that if you do that, they will make a lot of money from you in interest payments. What you should be focused on is the full amount outstanding and paying that before the due date when the interest payments come through."
There are no regulations that determine how credit card minimum payments are set. The Treasury's paper said they are typically 2-3 per cent of the outstanding balance.
Consumer advocacy groups including the Consumer Action Law Centre and CHOICE say minimum repayments should be lifted to ensure consumers aren't lumbered with high interest debt for decades.
CHOICE spokeswoman Nicky Breen said card issuers should also be required to "proactively contact customers" who are only making minimum payments and drawing out their debt.
"The federal government has had a consultation on broad credit card reform but no decisions have been made as of yet," she said.
Some card users simply don't have enough money to repay any more than the minimum. But Dr Keys and Dr Wang observe that when American credit card companies lifted their minimum payments, consumers paid the higher amount most of the time, suggesting they could have contributed that much all along.
Bessie Hassan, from financial comparison website finder.com.au, said card users with the means to make payments above the minimum payment should make a conscious effort to do so.
"Many borrowers fall into the mentality of thinking they just need to make the minimum payment on their credit card, or some may simply be unaware that they can make overpayments," she said.
"Typically, there's no cost involved for making overpayments so you've got nothing to lose and everything to gain."
Ms Hassan said that if a consumer with an average credit card debt of $3073 (and average card purchase interest rate of 17.31 per cent) paid the minimum repayment of $62, it would take 24 years to settle the debt and a total of $6000 in interest would be paid.
"However, if you increased your minimum monthly repayments by $50 to $112…you'd pay it off within three years and only pay a total of $867 in interest," she said.
Since 2011 Australian card issuers have been required to tell customers on statements how long it will take to repay debt if only the minimum payment is made.
But Mr Brody said there has not yet been any "rigorous analysis" of what impact this requirement has had on the behaviour of credit card users.
St Vincent de Paul's "Submission on Matters Relating to Credit Card Interest Rates 10 Aug 2015 includes:
some of the banks’ most profitable customers are those on low incomes caught in the spiral of credit card debt."" ....... it is likely that more financially vulnerable people will be using credit cards to tide them over in-between periods of employment. It is ironic that, in an era where banks are still reporting growth in profits,
In our work every day, we see these economically vulnerable families and individuals resort to borrowing money, selling items of value, taking out short-term pay day loans, and seeking the assistance of welfare services in addition to increasing the limit or taking out new credit cards when the offer is made available.[1]
The Australian Institute Paper No. 4 -
Money and power - The case for better regulation in banking (August 2010):"In fact, some of their most profitable customers, such as those who never pay off their credit cards in full, are also the very people who are least able to handle more debt. In this way, the impulses of individual consumers, carefully channelled by the banks, regularly come into conflict with the public interest.
Banks blasted for “unconscionable” credit card lending at Senate enquiry - finder - 15 Nov 2016