| |
Defined Terms and Documents
Prior to the Campbell Report
circa early 1980's, the RBA regulated all
bank interest rates with an Iron Fist -
"...
when de-regulation resulted in adverse consequences, re-regulation ensued...."
Below is an extract from the
Writer's
Discussion Paper 16
Mar 2019:
3. Prior to the Campbell Report
circa early 1980's, the RBA regulated all
bank interest rates with an Iron Fist -
"...
when de-regulation resulted in adverse consequences, re-regulation ensued..."
The
Unpleasant Truth About Australian Banking
notes:
"Before 1981, activities of major Australian
banks, including the manner they dealt with
customers,
were
subject to detailed regulations imposed by the Federal Government. Following the 1981
Campbell
Committee Report, banking regulations were significantly reduced."
Since 1911
Australia's 'central bank' heavily regulated Australian banks until
implementation of the Campbell Committee recommendations in the early '80s.
The Reserve Bank
and its then predecessor, the Govt. owned Commonwealth Bank, had increasingly
regulated 'with an iron fist
in a velvet glove'
the commercial banks since 1911. Historically when de-regulation resulted in adverse consequences,
re-regulation by Australia's 'central bank' ensued.
Below is an extract from
'Overview of
Financial Services Post-Deregulation'
by (Dr) Diana Beal, Director, Centre for Australian Financial Institutions,
University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, 2002:
"Interest-rate ceilings on deposit accounts restricted the
banks’ ability to attract funds particularly during the 1970s when inflation was
rampant. In the June quarter of 1975, inflation rose to 16.9% pa. At the same
time, interest payable on amounts held in savings accounts offered by savings
banks, for example, was restricted to 3.75% (by RBA regulation)
from 1969 to 1980 (Foster, 1996). In contrast, the interest rates offered by non-bank financial
institutions (NBFIs) were not controlled and they were able to pay around 10% on
passbook accounts."
"Banks in 1980 still operated in a highly
regulated environment which was an artefact of previous economic and social
conditions. Indeed, an extensive collection of controls remained from regulation
introduced under the National Security Regulations in 1941."
Particulars
of deregulations and subsequent re-regulations are well chronicled.
Below are extracts from
LOAN
RATE STICKINESS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE - RBA 1992:
In the case of overdrafts the
maximum rate on all overdrafts
was set by the Reserve Bank prior to February 1972.
From 1966, when personal loans were introduced, the maximum rate
that banks could charge was set by the Reserve Bank. Once again, in
April 1985, the controls were removed.
At the same time, the maximum interest rate that could be charged on credit cards was
deregulated.
Below is an extract from
the bottom of page 7 of
University of Wollongong 'Economics Working Paper Series 2012':
"Prior to 1985
the maximum rate that could be charged on credit cards had been set at 18 per
cent per annum by the Reserve Bank of Australia. In April 1985, this rate was
deregulated."
It is all chronicled in
Chapter
17 titled
Reserve Bank possessed and exercised 'extensive powers'
under
Section 50
of the
Banking Act 1959
to regulate/cap bank
deposit/investment interest rates from 1969 to 1980.
Reserve Bank must regulate interest rates and fees according to
User Pays Principle to bring Credit Card Products into line with
all other 'goods' and 'services, incl. other
banking lending products because Australians with low
Financial Literacy
Capacity have been exploited by some Credit Card
Issuers
Chapter 17 notes:
"The Campbell Committee was established in 1979 and reported in 1981. The
recommendations of the inquiry were targeted at ..... the abolition of direct
interest rate and portfolio controls on financial institutions
at a time when interest rates were at an absolute unprecedented high.
Campbell did not recommend
removal of any powers held by the Reserve Bank to regulate
interest rates or demand financial information. The Campbell recommendations were made following an
extended period of high interest rates. High deposit interest rates by
NBFIs existent circa 1980 are no longer an impediment to regulating credit card interest rates.
The abovementioned reference to Chapter Nine (in
Chapter 15 above): 'Stability and Payments'
of the Wallis Enquiry noted
"the RBA should retain overall
responsibility for the stability of the financial system, the provision of
emergency liquidity assistance and for regulating the payments system."
Below is an extract from
Consumer Affairs Victoria
- Regulating the cost of credit which evidences that in
the past if de-regulation did not achieve the desired results, then re-regulation
followed. But not with regard to re-introducing a max interest rate cap on
Credit Card, notwithstanding
that the
spread between the
current
Cash Rate
of 1.5% (2017) and the
Credit Card
Purchase
Interest Rate
of 20%
is 18.5%. (As at April 2017,
the highest
Purchase interest rate is 25.9% from
"Lombard
Visa Card Classic " and the
highest Cash Advance interest rate is 29.49%
from
G.E. Money's "Go Mastercard"):
"The tide of utilitarianism rose
slowly, and a lengthy campaign was necessary before the financial
deregulation of 1854, which abolished the British interest rate cap.
However, one act of deregulation cannot quell an argument that has been going on for millennia. Over the following century the tide gradually turned towards re-regulation, culminating with detailed requirements imposed on the financial sector (particularly the banks) during and immediately after the Second World War. We now trace the gradual lead-up to this second phase of regulation."
| |
|