Credit card issuers have traditionally targeted consumers by using information about their behaviors and demographics. Behaviors are often based on credit bureau reports on how a person spends and pays over time; customers are typically categorized as transactors, revolvers or subprime. Demographics are derived from census reports and other non-financial databases and cover facts such as income, age and geography. This model has served the industry well for decades, enabling it to offer three main card types—rewards, low-rate and subprime—to cater to different users.
Credit card issuers have traditionally targeted consumers by using information about their behaviors and demographics. Behaviors are often based on credit bureau reports on how a person spends and pays over time; customers are typically categorized as transactors, revolvers or subprime. Demographics are derived from census reports and other non-financial databases and cover facts such as income, age and geography. This model has served the industry well for decades, enabling it to offer three main card types—rewards, low-rate and subprime—to cater to different users.
However, with the dramatic decline in acquisitions over the past five years, issuers competing in similar segments with similar products are finding it hard to differentiate themselves: The total number of accounts at top issuers has declined by an average of 4 percent over the past five years according to
The Nilson Report. The result is a race to attract new accounts. Some issuers have offered as much as $400 to customers signing up for a new card, and the top five U.S. issuers are spending over $100 million a year on advertising campaigns. But as switching incentives rise, profit margins inevitably fall.Issuers do have an alternative: they can maintain a profit margin and generate demand for their product by providing only the benefits that customers value. The challenge for issuers is aligning the right value proposition with the right consumers. The question is: how do issuers develop a suite of credit cards that fulfill customers’ needs more precisely without piling on features that add needless complexity or are not valued by users? The answer lies in a more nuanced and powerful approach to customer segmentation—one that can, by extension, be adopted across a range of consumer finance products and markets.
This approach has already been used successfully for two recent credit card launches in the U.S., as well as one in Brazil, where a large issuer identified three distinct customer segments and shaped an integrated approach to the design of new products, messages and channels; the bank expects to see new accounts grow by 2 to 5 percent as it rolls out the cards in the coming months.
A new twist on needs-based segmentation
Attempting to develop a deeper and more rounded view of consumers is nothing new. Institutions have long sought closer connections with customers, but have struggled with limited data and arm’s-length interactions.
However, the two-way communications opened up by online and mobile channels enable today’s issuers to capture much more information about each customer, information that can be used to execute a sophisticated needs-based segmentation. (See previous article, “Digital banking: Winning the beachhead,” for more on leveraging customer behavior data for more advanced segmentation.) By connecting data on how people spend, save, shop and travel, banks can bridge the gaps between business lines, enhance their customer knowledge and improve cross-selling.
To do so, they need to have the right message and product available in the right channel when a potential customer comes looking. This is the new frontier of segmentation, channel and product strategy.
Targeting customers more precisely through smarter segmentation is easy to agree with but much more challenging to pull off. The secret lies in a hybrid approach that segments customers primarily by their needs and attitudes—exposing the underlying reasons why customers use their credit cards—but also takes into account a small number of financial behaviors (see sidebar, pages 14 and 15).
Adding these measures to the mix provides further representation of underlying needs and makes the segments easier to score in an issuer’s database. Armed with this segmentation, card issuers can not only craft better value propositions but also identify groups that are not well served by current offers.
Fine-tuning offers to meet distinct customer needs
McKinsey’s Global Concepts Consumer Life Survey provides an example of how adding financial behaviors into the mix results in segmentation that is more sharply differentiated:
Segment 1: Prosperous and content
People in this segment keep their finances in
order, use credit cards for 59 percent of their
purchases and love rewards; they
dislike revolvingdebt. They look for convenience and
minimum effort, preferring to “set it and forget
it” rather than get closely involved with
banks or card issuers. This is the wealthiest
segment in the McKinsey segmentation,
with an average of $503,000 in household
financial assets, five times the average for
credit card holders. It also has the highest
concentration of premium network card
users at 17 percent, twice the average.
Getting a card into this segment’s wallet involves
offering rewards. To differentiate their
card, issuers should position it not merely as a
spending instrument but as a tool that facilitates
financial success through ease of use. For
instance, if a credit card could offer a means
of steering a large purchase straight into a
low-rate installment loan, it could meet this
segment’s occasional borrowing needs without
the stigma or higher interest rates associated
with revolving credit.
Armed with enhanced segmentation, card issuers can not only craft better value propositions but also identify groups that are not well served by current offers.
Segment 2: Deal chasers
With average revolving debt of $3,802—
twice the average—these cardholders move
their balances around to chase the best
transfer rates. This segment is the most likely
to have a cobranded card (24 percent compared
with 17 percent overall) and to pay an
annual fee for a reward card (19 percent
compared with 13 percent).
Deal chasers arehighly involved with financial products and
are nearly as satisfied with their financial situation
as the
prosperous and content segment(34 and 37 percent respectively,
compared with 20 percent overall), and rank
second in both income ($65,000 median)
and financial assets ($150,000). Despite carrying
higher debt, they are confident about
managing it and view the economic outlook
as positive. They use online banking frequently,
with half making online transactions
three times a week.
Acquiring and keeping these customers calls
for a balancing act, as they see themselves as
pitted against issuers in a win-or-lose game.
Always striving to borrow at the lowest cost,
they try to steal the bait from issuers’ traps
without triggering fees or higher rates
through mishaps or oversights. To build fidelity,
issuers could foster a sense of partnership
rather than competition by making
these customers feel they are getting the best
deal and occasionally satisfying their appetite
for a great new offer; all, of course,
while ensuring the product remains profitable.
A big sign-up or annual bonus can be
justified, for instance, if a customer is likely
to spend heavily and fund the offer through
interchange revenue.
Segment 3: Financially stressed
People in this segment carry heavy credit
card debt—nearly four times the average, at
$7,453—and consider themselves unable to
control their spending or stick to a budget.
Some are chronic spendthrifts; others are
mired in circumstances that force them to
borrow on credit cards to pay for essentials.
They seldom shop around for better places
to put their outstanding balances and doubt
they will ever get out from under their burden
of debt. They expect financial trouble
for themselves and the wider economy. This
is the poorest among the segments, with just
a quarter of the financial assets (a mean of
$44,000) of the average cardholder.
Credit plays a crucial role in satisfying this
group’s day-to-day needs: keeping a roof
over their head, paying for their daily commute,
keeping a prescription filled. This is
not a sustainable path, but they are unable
to abandon it just yet. They value simplicity
and transparency in fees, rates and terms,
but their biggest need is for something that
no credit card offers: a mechanism allowing
them to impose their own spending limits.
This would enable them to carry a credit
card for larger purchases that take time to
pay off without fearing they might be
tempted to use it for non-essentials.
Acquiring and keeping
deal chasers calls for a balancing act, as they see themselves as pitted against issuers in a win-or-lose game. Always striving to borrow at the lowest cost, they try to steal the bait from issuers’ traps without triggering fees or higher rates through mishaps or oversights.McKinsey’s U.S. Consumer Financial Life Survey
McKinsey’s Consumer Financial Life Survey is an ongoing survey taken three times a year since
2009. Since the survey began, 24,000 U.S. consumers have taken the 30-minute self-administered
interview. Topics explored include financial behaviors, preferences and motivations, with an emphasis
on payments.
The data from the survey were used to create a needs-based segmentation of U.S. credit card holders
that yields a more comprehensive picture than traditional demographic- and behaviors-based segmentations
(Exhibit A).
The five groups identified by the segmentation are distinguished by members’ economic circumstances,
household money management style and reasons for using credit cards on various purchasing occasions.
In addition to needs and attitudes, the segmentation takes into account certain spending behaviors
that can be identified from customer data—namely, the volume of household expenditure, the proportion
spent on credit cards and the proportion of revolving debt to income—in order to score
customers and prospects more accurately into segments. Notably, these behaviors correspond to underlying
needs that can be addressed by a credit card product.
Since needs-based segmentation does not divide customers into profitable and unprofitable groups, issuers
must also evaluate indicators of profitability to determine whether and how to execute on each
needs segment. Exhibit A lists spending behaviors typically used for this purpose. Looking at combinations
of these traits at an individual level enables issuers to spot not only clearly profitable customers
but also “diamonds in the rough” who are financially desirable yet overlooked by competitors.
In Exhibit B we see sharp differences between segments for certain attitudes and behaviors. The green
bars indicate higher-than-average intensity of a given attitude or behavior; red bars indicate lower than
average intensity. For example, the
prosperous and content segment scores very low on the trait “Avoidcredit cards for day-to-day purchases” because members of this segment use credit cards as often as
possible;
recovering credit users, on the other hand, score high on the trait because they avoid usingcards more than other segments do.
14 McKinsey on Payments
May 2014New frontiers in credit card segmentation: Tapping unmet consumer needs
15Prosperous Deal Financially Recovering Self-aware
and content chasers stressed credit users avoiders
Percent of U.S. credit card holders in segment 23% 18% 19% 22% 18%
Median annual household income $85,000 $65,000 $45,000 $45,000 $55,000
Percent of segment with revolving credit card balance 29% 81% 93% 64% 64%
Mean credit card revolving balance per household $890 $3,802 $7,453 $1,726 $1,969
Most-used instrument for POS payments Credit Debit Debit Debit Cash
Share of credit card in POS spending 59% 24% 20% 11% 19%
Most-used credit card does not earn rewards 8% 37% 52% 45% 43%
Source: McKinsey/Global Concepts
Consumer Financial Life Survey
2012–13
Exhibit A
Profitability indicators should be considered in conjunction with needs segmentation
–100 +100
–100 +100
Move money around to get the best return
Want personal interaction with financial institution staff
Disciplined at saving and spending; avoid debt
Stick to a budget and keep finances in order
Card hop or transfer balances to keep rates & fees low
Finances are tight; feel in a hole & stressed
Credit card’s share of total POS spend
Avoid credit cards for day-to-day purchases
Prosperous and content
Want personal interaction with financial institution staff
Move money around to get the best return
Credit card’s share of total POS spend
Stick to a budget and keep finances in order
Card hop or transfer balances to keep rates & fees low
Disciplined at saving and spending; avoid debt
Avoid credit cards for day-to-day purchases
Believe issuers cause people to accumulate too much debt
Recovering credit users
Degree to which each trait distinguishes segment members from the average credit card user
A comparison of two segment examples
Source: McKinsey/Global Concepts
Consumer Financial Life Survey
2012–2013
Exhibit B
Credit card segments display sharply different traits
16 McKinsey on Payments
May 2014Segment 4: Recovering credit users
These individuals have become avid budgeters
who pride themselves on keeping
their financial house in order, although they
still revolve an average balance of $1,726.
Wary of financial institutions, they avoid the
stock market as too risky, fear their bank deposits
are unsafe and blame issuers when
consumers accumulate debts and fees they
are unable to pay off. Cardholders in this
segment avoid using credit cards for routine
purchases and seldom respond to zero-percent
teasers or high-reward offers. They prefer
to deal with bank staff in person and are
less likely than other segments to use online
banking, with just 49 percent doing so.
This group’s adversarial view of issuers suggests
they need reassuring that they can use
a credit card without stumbling into a
“gotcha” fee or triggering a penalty rate.
They need a product that helps them budget
and manage their spending—for instance, by
allowing them to define spending “buckets”
for various merchant types with monthly
limits (e.g., $200 at grocery stores, $80 at
mass merchants and $150 at restaurants).
As they approach one of these limits, a purchase
could trigger an SMS text or email
alert to warn them. An issuer could allay
fears of triggering a penalty fee by adding a
one-time “forgiveness voucher” to its card
offer, and attract a greater share of spending
by positioning the card as appropriate for
everyday purchases. This is an active, engaged
group that wants to control their
spending and are looking to companies that
can provide the necessary tools.
Segment 5: Self-aware avoiders
Like
recovering credit users, members of thissegment avoid using credit cards, although
they blame themselves rather than issuers
for their debt problems and worry about the
damage they could do to themselves with a
credit card. They use debit cards and cash
for three-quarters of their POS purchases,
but still carry an average revolving debt load
of $1,969 per household. They are slightly
better off than
recovering credit users—and,for that matter, average cardholders—in
terms of income and wealth.
Like the
financially stressed segment, theseconsumers are likely to respond to simplicity
and transparency in fees, rates and
terms. Bolstering their confidence that they
can use credit cards without mishap for certain
purchases, particularly for short-term
borrowing, will make a credit card more viable.
Similarly, they would feel more in control
if they could understand the payoff
horizon for major purchases. Cards that
could instantly calculate the scale and duration
of monthly payments for a given purchase
at the point of sale would better meet
this group’s needs.
A limited array of features can be assembled in different combinations to create a unique value proposition for each segment.
New frontiers in credit card segmentation: Tapping unmet consumer needs
17A limited array of features can be assembled in different combinations to create a unique value proposition for each of these five segments
(Exhibit 1). The first two—
prosperous and content and deal chasers—are already well served by the market through reward offers and zero-percent balance transfer deals. However, the remaining three segments have no products designed specifically to meet their needs. Issuers seeking to expand their card offerings and tap growth in underserved segments would do well to target these groups with their particular needs (and associated risks) in mind.Making it work
The first step for issuers is to reach alignment on their business objectives: what problem are they trying to solve with the segmentation, and how will they use the segmentation?
When segmentation efforts fail, it is often because more energy has gone into deriving the segmentation than thinking through the implementation.
When an issuer’s objective is to attract new
customers and drive revenues and growth, it
should use the segmentation to structure not
just product design but the whole acquisition
process from customer targeting to segment
positioning to delivery. That means
starting with a needs-based segment, developing
a card with features to meet those
needs and promoting it by explicitly communicating
how the features satisfy the needs.
The segmentation described above is well
suited to helping issuers design value propositions
with maximum appeal to distinct
consumer groups and frame how these
propositions are delivered.
(If, however, an issuer is more concerned
with revenue leakage, it could increase the
ratio of behavioral to attitudinal measures so
as to optimize scoring efficiency rather than
needs-based differentiation among the customers
it is trying to retain.)
Once objectives are set, deriving the segmentation
is typically a two-part process
combining qualitative research to uncover
needs and attitudes and quantitative research
to cluster and measure customers. Issuers
should use professionally moderated
qualitative research involving one-on-one
interviews, focus groups or online groups to
inform the design of the quantitative survey
and bring segments to life. For survey purposes,
issuers should recruit individuals
from market panels as well as existing customers
to help them understand how their
customer base differs from the wider market
and how they might increase share among
particular segments. Issuers can also append
their own data and create database proxies
to help type the segments in their database.
By using such methods, some issuers have
managed to increase their targeting ability
within a segment by up to 100 percent.
Having derived the segmentation, an issuer
must then hard-wire it into the business. To
be effective, segmentation must become
part of the rhythm of the organization, embedded
in its planning, measurement, goals
and incentives.
Rewards
Balance transfer offers
Easy account management
Low fees and interest
Occasional special deals discounting or
rewarding existing balances
Simple and transparent fees, rates and terms
Self-imposed spending limits
Budgeting within distinct purchase categories
“Daily needs” positioning
Avoidance of mishaps that trigger fees
Payoff horizon for each major purchase
Swipe to installment loan
Benefits Segments
Prosperous
and content
Deal
chasers
Financially
stressed
Recovering
credit users
Self-aware
avoiders
Source: McKinsey Payments Practice;
Global Concepts
Exhibit 1
Benefits can be bundled into distinct products to appeal to each segment
18 McKinsey on Payments
May 2014* * *
By building a richer, deeper view of customer segments, financial institutions can sharpen their value proposition, integrate cards with other lending products, reduce channel confusion and clarify positioning and promotions.
This approach helps to break down silos and rally business units around a common goal and a single company-wide view of the customer.
Luke Fiorio
is a senior analyst andThomas Welander
is an expert at Global Concepts, a wholly owned subsidiary of McKinsey & Company;Robert Mau
is a knowledge expert in the New York office; and Jonathan Steitz is an associate principal in the San Francisco office.