|
The Lancet. 1202 www.thelancet.com Vol 378 October 1, 2011Survival benefit associated with low-level physical activity 2 Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–13.3 Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, et al, for the ASCOT investigators. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 1149–58.4 Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366: 1267–78.5 Catapano AL, Reiner Z, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Atherosclerosis 2011;217 (suppl 1): 1–44.6 Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27: 2121–58.7 Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK, et al, on behalf of the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study Investigators. Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet 2011; published online Aug 28. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61302-0. 8 Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Cost-eff ectiveness of simvastatin in people at diff erent levels of vascular disease risk: economic analysis of a randomised trial in 20 536 individuals. Lancet 2005; 365: 1779–85.Published OnlineAugust 16, 2011 DOI:10.1016/S0140- 6736(11)61029-5 See Articles page 1244Figure: Relation between health benefi ts and physical activity In The Lancet, Chi Pang Wen and colleagues1 report theirfindings from a very large observational study, showing that a small amount of leisure-time physical activity reduces total mortality, mortality from cardiovascular disease, and mortality from cancer. Although the ability of physical activity in moderate amounts to reduce mortality from all causes has been well documented, 2–4the public-health recommendation in most countries is to do the equivalent of at least 30 min per day of walking, most days of the week—ie, 150 min per week. 5,6Wen and colleagues’ study shows that half this amount of physical activity (15 min per day for 6 days a week) reduces all-cause mortality by 14%, cancer mortality by 10%, and mortality from cardiovascular disease by 20%. To our knowledge, this is the first observational study of this size to report important and global health benefits at such a low volume of leisure-time physical activity with this degree of precision. The benefits of physical activity follow a dose-response curve (figure), which clearly shows that although a little amount of physical activity is good, more is better. In an ideal world, people would benefit greatly from 300 min of moderate-intensity physical activity per week, but data from most countries show that this amount of physical activity is achieved by only a small proportion of the population. 5,7 The reason forthis reality is multifactorial and complex, and individual, psychosocial, and environmental factors all play a part. 8Repeated, simple advice from a physician—as Wen and colleagues suggest—is one of many interventions that can effectively contribute to increased physical activity. 9We agree that this advice is very simple and probably easily achievable. Because of its observational nature, Wen and colleagues’ study cannot establish causality, but their results are entirely consistent with the findings of prospective randomised trials in secondary cardiovascular prevention that show a clear mortality benefit from regular exercise. 10,11 As such, the direct health benefits ofexercise are irrefutable. Exercise can reduce cardiovascular mortality and, in particular, coronary mortality by many mechanisms, including improvements in endothelial function, autonomic tone, inflammation, and risk-factor control. The final common pathways of cardiovascular risk reduction presumably operate through both improved endothelial function and improved autonomic regulation of cardiovascular function. 12 Improvedendothelial function leads to the prevention and stabilisation of coronary atherosclerosis, thereby Sedentary Health benefits 100 200 300 Weekly physical activity (min) 400 500 600 |
|
|