The Lancet.

1202 www.thelancet.com Vol 378 October 1, 2011

Survival benefit associated with low-level physical activity

2 Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood

pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one

million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–13.

3 Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, et al, for the ASCOT investigators.

Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive

patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol

concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid

Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Lancet 2003; 361: 1149–58.

4 Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of

cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from

90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;

366: 1267–78.

5 Catapano AL, Reiner Z, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the

management of dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the management

of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the

European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Atherosclerosis 2011;

217 (suppl 1): 1–44.

6 Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Reappraisal of European

guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of

Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27: 2121–58.

7 Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK, et al, on behalf of the Prospective Urban Rural

Epidemiology (PURE) Study Investigators. Use of secondary prevention

drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income,

middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective

epidemiological survey. Lancet 2011; published online Aug 28. DOI:10.1016/

S0140-6736(11)61302-0.

8 Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Cost-eff ectiveness of simvastatin

in people at diff erent levels of vascular disease risk: economic analysis of a

randomised trial in 20 536 individuals. Lancet 2005; 365: 1779–85.

Published Online

August 16, 2011

DOI:10.1016/S0140-

6736(11)61029-5

See Articles page 1244

Figure: Relation between health benefi ts and physical activity

In The Lancet, Chi Pang Wen and colleagues1 report their

findings from a very large observational study, showing

that a small amount of leisure-time physical activity

reduces total mortality, mortality from cardiovascular

disease, and mortality from cancer. Although the ability

of physical activity in moderate amounts to reduce

mortality from all causes has been well documented,2–4

the public-health recommendation in most countries

is to do the equivalent of at least 30 min per day of

walking, most days of the week—ie, 150 min per week.5,6

Wen and colleagues’ study shows that half this amount

of physical activity (15 min per day for 6 days a week)

reduces all-cause mortality by 14%, cancer mortality by

10%, and mortality from cardiovascular disease by 20%.

To our knowledge, this is the first observational study of

this size to report important and global health benefits at

such a low volume of leisure-time physical activity with

this degree of precision. The benefits of physical activity

follow a dose-response curve (figure), which clearly shows

that although a little amount of physical activity is good,

more is better. In an ideal world, people would benefit

greatly from 300 min of moderate-intensity physical

activity per week, but data from most countries show

that this amount of physical activity is achieved by only

a small proportion of the population.5,7 The reason for

this reality is multifactorial and complex, and individual,

psychosocial, and environmental factors all play a part.8

Repeated, simple advice from a physician—as Wen and

colleagues suggest—is one of many interventions that

can effectively contribute to increased physical activity.9

We agree that this advice is very simple and probably

easily achievable.

Because of its observational nature, Wen and

colleagues’ study cannot establish causality, but their

results are entirely consistent with the findings of

prospective randomised trials in secondary cardiovascular

prevention that show a clear mortality benefit from

regular exercise.10,11 As such, the direct health benefits of

exercise are irrefutable. Exercise can reduce cardiovascular

mortality and, in particular, coronary mortality by many

mechanisms, including improvements in endothelial

function, autonomic tone, inflammation, and risk-factor

control. The final common pathways of cardiovascular

risk reduction presumably operate through both

improved endothelial function and improved autonomic

regulation of cardiovascular function.12 Improved

endothelial function leads to the prevention and

stabilisation of coronary atherosclerosis, thereby

Sedentary

Health benefits

100 200 300

Weekly physical activity (min)

400 500 600