Days out from the likely release of the federal government's
anti-corruption bill, some key crossbenchers are raising
concerns it might not be given the level of power they are
looking for.
Key points:
-
The government says it will establish a body
with "broad
powers" to tackle corruption both inside and around the
federal government
-
Senator David Pocock says it is
crucial the
integrity commission has the power to investigate people
who are not politicians
-
The bill should adopt the definition taken on by
bodies like the
New South Wales ICAC, Anthony Whealy KC says
Federal parliament will resume next week after a fortnight's
delay due to the death of the Queen, and the government will use
the sitting period to introduce the long-promised integrity
commission legislation.
While details around the bill remain a secret for now, the
government says it would establish a body with "broad powers" to
tackle corruption both inside and around the federal government.
But key crossbenchers — including some the government might rely
on in the Senate to support the bill — are concerned it could be
hamstrung by tight definitions of who it can and cannot
investigate.
Independent senator David Pocock and independent MP Helen Haines
both argue the commission has to be able to investigate anybody
undertaking any sort of dealing with the government.
It could emerge as a stumbling block as the government looks to
have the bill legislated before the end of the year.
How broad should the
body's powers be?
In a recent speech, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus spelled out
who would be covered under the government's integrity bill.
"The commission will operate independently of government and
will have broad jurisdiction to investigate serious or systemic
corruption across the Commonwealth public sector," he said.
"It will have the power to investigate ministers,
parliamentarians and their staff, public servants, statutory
office holders and contractors."
Some on the crossbench want the bill to go further than that,
and cover any third party involved in federal politics.
Senator Pocock, who could provide a critical vote for the
government in the upper house, said there was no reason to limit
the body's scope.
"It's
crucial that the integrity commission has the power to
actually investigate third parties, people who aren't
politicians," he said.
"We know that a lot of corruption starts with people potentially
getting in touch with politicians, whether they're business
people, unions, developers — this body needs to be able to
actually investigate them and bring them before the integrity
commission."
Ms Haines said while it was good that contractors would be
covered by the new body, it needed to be able to capture people
and businesses trying to pick up government work too.
"There are others that would seek to have contracts, who may
seek to have dealings with the Commonwealth, that could be
potentially trying to corrupt a public process," she said.
"So we need to make sure that we can capture anyone in such
circumstances."
Defining corruption not a simple task
The government is also
being urged to adopt a very broad definition of corruption, to
avoid limiting the potential work of the new body.
Anthony Whealy KC, from
the Centre for Public Integrity, said the bill should adopt the
definition taken on by bodies like the New South Wales ICAC and
other state bodies.
"It doesn't matter
whether it's somebody bribing an official, or offering favours
to an official and actually corrupting them, or whether it's
serious misleading of officials, that constitutes criminal
corruption," he said.
"We would like to see
the broadest definition available so that third parties know
they're on notice that they will be scrutinised at federal
level, just as they are at state level throughout most of the
states and territories."
He said there might be some overlap with the role of police,
which would not necessarily be a bad thing.
"There's a theory around that you don't need to include third
parties because they can be investigated by the police for
criminal behaviour," he said.
"But I think we all know that the police don't have the broad
powers that an anti-corruption body has, and they don't have the
experience in unearthing corruption.
"So I think that it would be a great shame to restrict the
ability of our new anti-corruption agency to examine corrupt
third-party behaviour in as broad a manner as possible."
Asked what sort of definition the government would adopt, a
spokesperson for the Attorney-General pointed to the bill's
impending release.
"The Albanese Labor government will introduce legislation to
establish a powerful, transparent and independent National
Anti-Corruption Commission in the next session of parliament,"
they said.
"The commission will be tasked with investigating serious or
systemic corruption.
"The commission will be independent and the government will not
be instructing the commission on what it can and cannot
investigate."
The bill is
expected to be introduced on Tuesday.