| |
Defined Terms and Documents
Discussion Paper
Annexure A
Annexure B
A
comprehensive and constructive
Business
Case provides justification for undertaking a
Greenfield Infrastructure Project or
Brownfield Infrastructure Project.
It evaluates the benefit, cost and risk of alternative options and provides a
rationale for the preferred solution.
Business Case is the generalised term for
Cost-Benefit Analysis.
The foundation stone of a
Cost-Benefit Analysis is a
Base Case Financial Model.
Below are extracts from
Commonwealth Dept of Finance 'Developing
a Business Case':
What is a business case?
A business case sets out the problem
or opportunity, considers options, analyses costs, benefits and risks, and
ultimately supports an investment decision. The completion of a
detailed business case on investment
proposals coming forward is encouraged. The business case should clearly
outline the nature of the policy problem the investment is seeking to
address that directly links to the goals and objectives of the Government in
the market/sector in which the investment is proposed.
A business case is considered the key document to support investment
decision-making. To ensure that it achieves its purpose the business case
should be continually updated throughout the development and decision-making
process to include the best information available, while taking into account
whole-of-life cycle considerations.
The essential elements of a business case are outlined below. These have
been modified from Infrastructure Australia guidance for application in a
broader range of policy proposals. For infrastructure projects
where Australian Government funding
sought is greater
than $100 million please
refer to the Infrastructure
Australia Assessment Framework.
Essential elements of a business case
1. Identify problems and/or opportunities
The purpose of
this stage is to identify current and emerging problems and
opportunities and demonstrate the benefits of addressing them.
A
‘problem’ is a cost to be avoided or saved, while an ‘opportunity’ is a
benefit to be gained.
The impact of problems or opportunities should be demonstrated using
evidence, including:
Key questions to address include:
- Is the problem/opportunity expressed
as a straightforward statement?
- Is the problem/opportunity to link
to other problems, programs and projects?
- How does the problem/opportunity
align with relevant Government priorities/policy objectives?
- Is the problem/opportunity measured
by quantitative and/or qualitative data?
- Has the problem/opportunity been
monetised over time?
- What are the assumptions about
future trends in drivers (e.g. population, economic growth, technology,
climate trends)?
- Have the project/opportunity
interrelationships been described?
2. Options analysis
The purpose of
this stage is to present a wide range of options, including a base case,
to address an identified problem or opportunity. You should then assess
each of these options through a rigorous process to determine which are
likely to most benefit the Australian community. Options Analysis should
identify a long list of options to address the problems and opportunities
that were identified above.
The long list of options should represent a wide range of reasonable
alternatives (both capital and non‑capital) and a detailed and
evidence-based assessment to determine a shortlist of these options. You
should consider how individual initiatives and options can be packaged
together or better coordinated for a more efficient and effective
outcome, and how such options can handle future uncertainty if
necessary.
The key deliverables from this stage are:
- a description of each option
- benefits
-
cost information (including capital
expenditure and operating expenditure, where relevant), at a high level
- a description of the option’s
expected impact in terms of efficiency, equity and productivity, imposed
on or gained by stakeholders by the possible initiatives
3. Detailed business case development
The purpose of
this stage is to refine and finalise your business case by:
Key questions to address include:
- How was the project contingency
estimated?
- For each benefit component, how
were the benefits estimated? What are the forecast benefits?
- What are the characteristics of
the underlying demand model?
- What timeframe has demand been
modelled over (month, quarter, year etc.)?
- Who were the capital cost
estimates prepared by?
- What are the underlying
characteristics of the cost-benefit
analysis conducted
for each project case?
- What are the ongoing costs
associated with the project, including maintenance and operating
costs?
-
Are costs consistent with best
practice cost estimation guidelines?
- What sensitivity analysis has
been undertaken?
- Related initiatives or projects
– Are the benefits and costs closely related to, dependent upon or
potentially influenced by other initiatives or projects?
- Are there any non-monetised
costs and benefits? If so, what are the potential project benefits
from them?
- What is the Delivery Strategy
and Operations Strategy?
- How will the project be funded
and financed?
- What are the unmitigated project
risks?
-
What is the Post Completion
Review strategy/approach
See also
Greenfield,
Eleven Steps To Complete A
Greenfield Or
Brownfield
Infrastructure Project Finance Transaction.
| |
|