Part 5
of Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Bill
2002 ostensibly concerns the civil liability of public or other authorities,
including the Crown, government departments, public health
organisations, local councils, as well as organisers of
recreational activities.
When determining whether an authority ought to have
exercised a function, the courts must take into account the
financial and other resources that are reasonably available
to the authority for the purpose of exercising those
functions.
The below
extract of section 45 deals specifically with liability claims against road authorities. A road authority is not liable for harm arising
from the failure to carry out roadwork,
unless at the time
of the alleged failure the authority had actual knowledge of
the particular risk the materialisation of which resulted in
the harm:
"45
Special
non-feasance protection for roads authorities
(1) A roads
authority is not liable in proceedings to which this
Part applies for harm arising from a failure of the
authority to carry out road work, or to consider
carrying out road work, unless at the time of the
alleged failure the authority had actual knowledge of
the particular risk the materialisation of which
resulted in the harm.
(2) This section
does not operate:
(a) to create a duty of care in
respect of a risk merely because a roads authority has
actual knowledge of the risk, or
(b) to affect any
standard of care that would otherwise be applicable in
respect of a risk.
(3) In this section: carry out road work means carry out any
activity in connection with the construction, erection,
installation, maintenance, inspection, repair, removal
or replacement of a road work within the meaning of the
Roads Act 1993. roads authority has the same meaning as in
the Roads Act 1993."
Section 45 seems to -
(A) require a
roads authority
to carry out road workto
remove or reduce a particular risk once
the roads authority
becomes aware of such particular risk;
(B) deem that if the
roads authority
does not so remove or reduce such particular risk and that
particular risk materialises then the roads authorityis liable for damages from harm suffered; and
(C) require the courts to take into account the financial and other
resources that are reasonably available to the
roads
authority for the
purpose of exercising those functions.