|
Corporate Governance 37 Board of Directors Charter The role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors are set out in the Board Charter. The responsibilities include: The corporate governance of the Bank, including the establishment of Committees; Oversight of the business and affairs of the Bank by: − establishing, with management, the strategiesand financial objectives; − approving major corporate initiatives;− establishing appropriate systems of riskmanagement; and − monitoring the performance of management;Communicating with shareholders and the community, results of, and developments in, the operations of the Bank; Appointment of the Chief Executive Officer; and Approval of the Bank’s major HR policies and overseeing the development strategies for senior and high performing executives. There is in place a comprehensive set of management delegations to allow management to carry on the business of the Bank. Composition There are currently 12 Directors of the Bank and details of their experience, qualifications, special responsibilities and attendance at meetings are set out in the Directors report. Membership of the Board and Committees is set out below: DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Nominations Remuneration Audit Risk J T Ralph, AC Non-executive, Independent Chairman Chairman Chairman Chairman J M Schubert Non-executive, Independent Deputy Chairman Member Chairman D V Murray Executive Chief Executive Officer Member N R Adler, AO Non-executive, Independent Member R J Clairs, AO Non-executive, Independent Member A B Daniels, OAM Non-executive, Independent Member C R Galbraith, AM Non-executive, Independent Member S C Kay Non-executive, Independent Member W G Kent, AO Non-executive, Independent Member F D Ryan Non-executive, Independent Member F J Swan Non-executive, Independent Member Member B K Ward Non-executive, Independent Member Ms S C Kay was appointed as a non-executive Director on 5 March 2003. In accordance with the Bank’s Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules, she will stand for election at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 31 October 2003. The Constitution of the Bank specifies that – The Chief Executive Officer and any other executive director shall not be eligible to stand for election as Chairman of the Bank; The number of Directors shall not be less than 9 nor more than 13 (or such lower number as the Board may from time to time determine). The Board have determined that for the time being, the number of directors shall be 12; and At each Annual General Meeting one-third of Directors (other than the chief executive officer) shall retire from office and may stand for re-election. The Board have established a policy that, with a phasing in provision for existing Directors, the term of directors’ appointments would be limited to 12 years (except where succession planning for Chairman and appointment of Chairman requires an extended term. On appointment, the Chairman will be expected to be available for that position for five years). Directors do not stand for re-election after attaining the age of 70 Corporate Governance (continued) 38 Independence The Board regularly assesses the independence of each Director. For this purpose an independent Director is a non-executive Director whom the Board considers to be independent of management and free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with the exercise of unfettered and independent judgment. In addition to being required to conduct themselves in accordance with the ethical policies of the Bank, Directors are required to be meticulous in their disclosure of any material contract or relationship in accordance with the Corporations Act and this disclosure extends to the interests of family companies and spouses. Directors are required to strictly adhere to the constraints on their participation and voting in relation to matters in which they may have an interest in accordance with the Corporations Act and the Bank's policies. Each Director may from time to time have personal dealings with the Bank. Each Director is involved with other companies or professional firms which may from time to time have dealings with the Bank. Details of offices held by Directors with other organisations are set out in the Directors' Report and on the Bank's website. Full details of related party dealings are set out in notes to the Company's accounts as required by law. All the current non-executive Directors of the Bank have been assessed as independent Directors. In reaching that determination, the Board have taken into account (in addition to the matters set out above): The specific disclosures made by each Director as referred to above; Where applicable, the related party dealings referrable to each Director, noting that those dealings are not material under accounting standards; That no Director is, or has been associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the Bank; That no non-executive Director has ever been employed by the Bank or any of its subsidiaries; That no Director is, or has been associated with a supplier, professional adviser, consultant to or customer of the Bank which is material under accounting standards; and That no non-executive Director personally carries on any role for the Bank otherwise than as a Director of the Bank. The Bank does not consider that term of service on the Board is a factor affecting a Director's ability to act in the best interests of the Bank. Independence is judged against the ability, integrity and willingness of the Director to act. The Board have established a policy limiting Directors' tenures to ensure that skill sets remain appropriate in a dynamic industry. Education Directors participate in an induction programme upon appointment and in a refresher programme on a regular basis. The Board have established a programme of continuing education to ensure that it is kept up to date with developments in the industry both locally and globally. This includes sessions with local and overseas experts in the particular fields relevant to the Bank’s operations. Review The Board have in place a process for annually reviewing its performance, policies and practices. These reviews seek to identify where improvements can be made and also assess the quality and effectiveness of information made available to Directors. Every 2 years, this process is facilitated by an external consultant, with an internal review conducted in the intervening years. The review includes an assessment of the performance of each Director. After consideration of the results of the performance assessment, the Board will determine its endorsement of the Directors to stand for re-election at the next Annual General Meeting. The non-executive Directors meet at least annually, without management, in a forum intended to allow for an open discussion on Board and management performance. This is in addition to the consideration of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance and remuneration which is conducted by the Board in the absence of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman meets annually with the senior executive team to discuss with them the Board’s performance and level of involvement from their perspective. Selection of Directors The Nominations Committee have developed a set of criteria for director appointments which have been adopted by the Board. The criteria set the objective of the Board as being as effective, and preferably more effective than the best boards in the comparable peer group. These criteria, which are reviewed annually, ensure that any new appointee is able to contribute to the ongoing effectiveness of the Board, have the ability to exercise sound business judgment, to think strategically and have demonstrated leadership experience, high levels of professional skill and appropriate personal qualities. The Committee regularly reviews the skill base and experience of existing Directors to enable identification of attributes required in new Directors. An executive search firm is engaged to identify potential candidates based on the identified criteria. Candidates for appointment as Directors are considered by the Nominations Committee, recommended for decision by the Board and, if appointed, stand for election, in accordance with the Constitution, at the next general meeting of shareholders. On appointment, a letter is provided from the Chairman to the new Director setting out the terms of appointment. Policies Board policies relevant to the composition and functions of Directors include: The Board will consist of a majority of independent non-executive Directors and the membership of the Nominations, Remuneration and Audit Committees should consist solely of independent non-executive Directors. The Risk Committee should consist of a majority of independent non-executive Directors. The Chairman will be an independent non-executive Director who should also chair the Nominations, Remuneration and Risk Committees. The Audit Committee will be chaired by an independent nonexecutive Director other than the Board Chairman. The Board will generally meet monthly with an agenda designed to provide adequate information about the affairs of the Bank, allow the Board to guide and monitor management and assist involvement in discussions and decisions on strategy. Matters having strategic implications are given priority on the agenda for regular Board Corporate Governance (continued) 40 Remuneration systems will complement and reinforce the Group’s leadership and succession planning systems; and Remuneration and terms and conditions of employment will be specified in an individual contract of employment and signed by the executive and the Bank. The relationship of remuneration, potential short term incentive and long term incentive payments is established for each level of executive management by the Remuneration Committee. For managers within the Bank potential incentive payments as a proportion of total potential remuneration increases with level in the organisation. The structure for some specialists differs from that which applies generally to executive management. Incentive payments for executives, including the Chief Executive Officer, are related to performance. Short term incentives actually paid depend on the extent to which operating targets set at the beginning of the financial year are achieved. Half of the short term incentive earned is paid in cash and the balance in two instalments at yearly intervals in shares. These instalments are only paid if the Executive is still in the employ of the Bank on the relevant dates. Vesting of options and shares allocated under the long term incentive plan is directly related to shareholder value, measured by Total Shareholder Return over a minimum 3 year period, which requires the return to be equal to or higher than the average return of peer institutions for vesting to occur. As approved by the shareholders at the 2000 Annual General Meeting, vesting of options and restricted shares allocated to executives is dependent on the Bank meeting the performance hurdles in the plan. The Bank has restructured its long-term executive incentive plan, effective from the beginning of the 2003 financial year. Previously half the value of long term incentive benefits under the shareholder approved Bank’s Equity Reward Plan were paid in options, valued on the Black-Scholes method, and the other half in Performance shares valued at market price at the date of allocation. These options and shares only vest to the executive provided the prescribed performance hurdles are met. From the beginning of the 2003 financial year options have been eliminated from the remuneration package of executives and the total value of the long term incentives allocated under the Equity Reward Plan from that date is in the form of Reward shares. A further change introduced is that whereas previously allocated options and shares vested upon the average Total Shareholder Return of peer institutions being exceeded, a sliding scale has been introduced so that 50% of allocated shares vest if the Bank’s TSR is equal to the average return, 75% vest at the 67th percentile in the index and 100% when the return exceeds the 75th percentile, ie. when the Bank’s return is in the top quartile. Options and shares previously allocated under the Equity Reward Plan will continue until they vest upon the prescribed performance hurdles being met or they lapse. Currently, restricted shares purchased on market to satisfy incentives earned by executives are charged against profit and loss as are incentives paid in cash and in deferred shares. As from the beginning of the 2003 financial year, total remuneration, which includes the full cost of the plan and also the distribution of shares to employees under the ESAP, have been expensed against profits. Details of the remuneration paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the five highest paid other members of the senior executive team who were officers of the Bank at 30 June 2003 are set out in Note 46. Audit Arrangements Audit Committee The Charter of the Audit Committee incorporates a number of policies and practices to ensure that the Committee is independent and effective. Among these are: The Audit Committee consists entirely of independent non-executive Directors, all of whom have familiarity with financial management and at least one has expertise in financial accounting and reporting. The Chairman of the Bank is not permitted to be the Chairman of the Audit Committee. At least twice a year the Audit Committee meets the external auditors and the chief internal audit executive and also separately with the external Auditors independently of management. The Audit Committee is responsible for nominating the external auditor to the Board for appointment by shareholders. The Audit Committee approves the terms of the contract with the external auditor, agrees the annual audit plan and approves payments to the Auditor. The Audit Committee discusses and receives assurances from the external auditors on the quality of the Bank’s systems, its accounting processes and its financial results. It also receives a report from the Auditors on any significant matters raised by the Auditors with management. All material accounting matters requiring exercise of judgement by management are specifically reviewed by the Audit Committee and reported on by the Committee to the Board. Certified assurances are received by the Audit Committee and the Board that the Auditors meet the independence requirements as recommended by the Blue Ribbon Committee of the SEC of the USA. In carrying out these functions, the Committee: Reviews the financial statements and reports of the Group; Reviews accounting policies to ensure compliance with current laws, relevant regulations and accounting standards; Conducts any investigations relating to financial matters, records, accounts and reports which it considers appropriate; and Reviews all material matters requiring exercise of judgment by management and reports those matters to the Board. In addition, the Committee ratifies the Group’s operational risk policies for approval by the Board and reviews and informs the Board of the measurement and management of operational risk. Operational risk is a basic line management responsibility within the Group consistent with the policies established by the Committee. A range of insurance policies maintained by the Group mitigates some operational risks. The Committee regularly considers, in the absence of management and the external auditor, the quality of the information received by the Committee and, in considering the financial statements, discusses with management and the external auditor: The financial statements and their conformity with accounting standards, other mandatory reporting requirements and statutory requirements; and The quality of the accounting policies applied and any other significant judgments made. The external audit partner attends meetings of the Audit Committee by invitation and attends the Board meetings when the annual and half yearly accounts are approved and signed. Non-Audit Services The Board have in place policies and procedures governing the nature of non-audit services which can and cannot be undertaken by the Bank’s Auditors for the Bank or its subsidiaries. These policies and procedures incorporate approval by the Audit Committee of all nonaudit services. The objective of this policy is to avoid prejudicing the independence of the Auditors and to prevent their developing undue reliance on revenue from the Bank. The policy ensures that the Auditor does not: Assume the role of management; Become an advocate for their client; or Audit their own professional expertise. Under the policy, the Auditor shall not provide the following services: Bookkeeping or services relating to accounting records; Appraisal or valuation and fairness opinions; Advice on deal structuring and related documentation Tax planning and strategic advice; Actuarial advisory services; Executive recruitment or extensive human resource functions; Acting as a broker-dealer, promoter or underwriter; or Provision of legal services. For non-audit services that are not expressly prohibited, the following Audit Committee approval processes apply: Pre-approved - the Audit Committee have preapproved certain types of services that do not impair Auditor independence up to a limit of $250,000 per engagement; and Specific approval - all other services, including preapproved services exceeding $250,000, require specific formal approval by the Audit Committee, or a member thereof under delegation, before the Auditor may be engaged. Non-audit services are defined as any service provided by the external Auditor under engagement with the Bank outside the scope of the external audit. The scope of the external audit is outlined in the Bank’s annual audit engagement letter. The Bank currently requires that the partner managing the audit for the external Auditor be changed within a period of five years. Auditor Ernst & Young was appointed as the Auditor of the Bank at the 1996 Annual General Meeting and continues in that office. The Chief Executive Officer is authorised to appoint and remove the chief internal audit executive in consultation with the Audit Committee. Risk Management Risk Committee The Risk Committee oversees credit and market risks assumed by the Bank in the course of carrying on its business. The Committee considers the Group’s credit policies and ensures that management maintains a set of credit underwriting standards designed to achieve portfolio outcomes consistent with the Group’s risk/return expectations. In addition, the Committee reviews the Group’s credit portfolios and recommendations by management for provisioning for bad and doubtful debts. The Committee approves risk management policies and procedures for market, funding and liquidity risks incurred or likely to be incurred in the Group’s business. The Committee reviews progress in implementing management procedures and identifying new areas of exposure relating to market, funding and liquidity risk. Framework The Bank has in place an integrated risk management framework to identify, assess, manage and report risks and risk adjusted returns on a consistent and reliable basis. A full description of the functions of the framework and the nature of the risks is set out in the section of the Annual Report entitled Integrated Risk Management and in Notes 14 and 39 to the Financial Statements. Nominations Committee The Nominations Committee of the Board critically reviews, at least annually, the corporate governance procedures of the Bank and the composition and effectiveness of the Commonwealth Bank Board and the boards of the major wholly owned subsidiaries. The policy of the Board is that the Committee shall consist solely of independent non executive directors and that the Chairman of the Bank shall be Chairman of the Committee. The Chief Executive Officer attends the meeting by invitation. In addition to its role in proposing candidates for director appointment for consideration by the Board, the Committee reviews fees payable to non-executive directors and reviews, and advises the Board in relation to Chief Executive Officer succession planning. Continuous Disclosure The Corporations Act 2001 and the ASX Listing Rules require that a company disclose to the market matters which could be expected to have a material effect on the price or value of the company’s securities. Management processes are in place throughout the Commonwealth Bank Group to ensure that all material matters which may potentially require disclosure are promptly reported to the Chief Executive Officer, through established reporting lines, or as a part of the deliberations of the Bank’s Executive Committee. Matters reported are assessed and, where required by the Listing Rules, advised to the market. The Company Secretary is responsible for communications with the ASX and for ensuring that such information is not released to any person until the ASX have confirmed its release to the market. Ethical Policies Values Statement The Bank demands the highest standards of honesty and loyalty from all its people and strong governance within the Bank. Our values statement – “trust, honesty and integrity” - reflects this standard. Statement of Professional Practice The Bank have adopted a code of ethics, known as a Statement of Professional Practice, which sets standards of behaviour required of all employees including: To act properly and efficiently in pursuing the objectives of the Bank; To avoid situations which may give rise to a conflict of interests; To know and adhere to the Bank’s Equal Employment Opportunity policy and programs; To maintain confidentiality in the affairs of the Bank and its customers; and To be absolutely honest in all professional activities. These standards are regularly communicated to staff. In addition, the Bank have established insider trading guidelines for staff to ensure that unpublished price sensitive information about the Bank or any other company is not used in an illegal manner. Our People The Bank is committed to providing fair, safe, challenging and rewarding work, recognising the importance of attracting and retaining the best staff and consequently, being in a position to provide good service to our customers. There are various policies and systems in place to enable achievement of these goals, including : Fair Treatment Review systems; Equal Employment Opportunity policy; Occupational Health and Safety Systems; Recruitment and selection policies; Performance feedback and review processes; Career assessment and succession planning; Employee Share Plan; and Supporting Professional Development. Behaviour Issues The Bank is strongly committed to maintaining an ethical workplace, complying with legal and ethical responsibilities. Policy requires staff to report fraud, corrupt conduct, mal-administration or serious and substantial waste by others. A system has been established which allows staff to remain anonymous if they wish for reporting of these matters. The policy has been extended to include reporting of auditing and accounting issues which will be reported directly to the Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer reports any such matters to the Audit Committee, noting the status of resolution and actions to be taken. Governance Philosophy The Board have consistently placed great importance on the governance of the Bank, which it believes is vital to the well-being of the corporation. The Bank has adopted a comprehensive framework of Corporate Governance Guidelines which are designed to properly balance performance and conformance and thereby allow the Bank to undertake, in an effective manner, the prudent risk-taking activities which are the basis of its business. US Sarbanes-Oxley Act On 30 July 2002, a broad US financial reporting and corporate governance reform law, called the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (the SOX Act), was enacted. By its terms, this Act applies to the Group because it has certain securities registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Under the Exchange Act, the Bank files periodic reports with the SEC, including an annual report on Form 20-F. Pursuant to the requirements of the SOX Act, the SEC have adopted rules requiring that the Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer personally provide certain certifications with respect to the disclosure contained in the annual report on Form 20-F. Some of the more significant certifications generally include: That based on their knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact and the financial statements and other financial information included within the report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Group; That they have ensured that appropriate disclosure controls and procedures have been put in place such that all material information has been disclosed and made known to them and they have evaluated the effectiveness of those disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the Group’s fiscal year and presented in the annual report on Form 20-F their conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the most recent fiscal year; That in respect of internal controls over financial reporting they have disclosed to the Group’s external auditors and to the Audit Committee of the board of directors all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of those internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Group’s ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information, and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Group’s internal control over financial reporting; and The annual report on Form 20-F discloses whether or not there were any changes in internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by the annual report on Form 20-F that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Group’s internal control over financial reporting. The Group will in addition to providing these certifications make the following disclosures in its annual report on Form 20-F: The Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the assistance of other members of the Group’s management, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. The Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have also concluded that there have not been any changes in the Group’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Group’s internal control over financial reporting. The SOX Act prohibits an issuer from extending or maintaining credit, arranging for the extension of credit, or renewing an extension of credit, in the form of a personal loan to or for any director or executive officer of the Group, unless one of the limited exceptions is available. Loans maintained by the Group before 30 July 2002 are exempt so long as there is no material modification to any term of the extension of credit or any renewal of the extension of credit. The Group is also required to disclose in its annual report on Form 20-F for the 2004 financial year, whether it has adopted a written code of ethics applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Certifications and Disclosures In respect of this annual report and as at the date of this annual report, the Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer make the following Sarbanes-Oxley related certifications: That they have reviewed the report; That based on their knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report; That based on their knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Group as of, and for, the periods presented in the report; That they are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the US Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Group and have: − designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under their supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Group, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared; − evaluated the effectiveness of those disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report their conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and − disclosed in this report any change in theGroup’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Group’s internal control over financial reporting; and That they have disclosed, based on their most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Group’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Group’s Board of Directors: − all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Group’s ability to record, process, summarise and report financial data; and − any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Group’s internal control over financial reporting. Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the assistance of other members of the Group’s management, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures as of 30 June 2003. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have each concluded that the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Changes in internal control over financial reporting No changes in our internal controls over financial reporting occurred during the year ended 30 June 2003 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. End page 33
|
|
|